Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Holy Cow

CLARIFICATION: Everything in this post is a HOAX/PARODY.


"While a state congressman, Barack Obama used to pimp out his wife Michelle and his two young daughters on the streets of Chicago for dime bags of crack."

Stunning, if it's true. Steph, I think you should be able to get your money back. I'm guessing you wouldn't have contributed had you known that he was pimping out his wife and two young daughters on the streets of Chicago for dime bags of crack. True or not, the party is destroying him by telling these tales.

This reporting is coming from various sources, including Newsweek. I guess they will now be lumped into the ever-expanding list of "conservative media" outlets. He is woefully un-qualified for the office of president. If he pimped out his wife and two young daughters on the streets of Chicago for dime bags of crack, I would suggest to you that he isn't qualified to be the mayor of Chicago. Then again, Chicago has been electing corrupt politicians forever. Guess things are VERY different up there.

There's speculation that the sources for these stories were fans of Hillary’s so they're sandbagging him on behalf of Hill with an eye to 2012. But the DNC is dispatching lawyers to Illinois to look into it which sounds more like a full-party effort to undo him.

I heard this subject discussed today on a leftie radio program. Their answer was, of course, no they did not have a duty to replace him. Here was the reasoning: If you (Biden) felt that you were better for the country as Vice-President than Palin, then you say nothing because if you do, you lose. If you win and Obama becomes President, the WH has people that can and will tell him to stop pimping out his wife and two young daughters for dime bags of crack.

Not quite sure I followed that logic, but they are grasping at anything try and not blame Cokehead Barry.

Not that I'm a prayerful person, but if I were, I would pray to whomever that Obama runs in 2012. If he is the best the lefties can come up with, THAT is the ultimate clue to show how far the Democrat party has fallen. Talking about scraping the bottom of the barrel.

Can we agree on this?

If it is true that campaign staff learned that Obama pimped out his wife and two young daughters for dime bags of crack, did they not have a responsibility to the people of this country to replace him on the ticket? Was it OK for them to view this as simply an adversarial process where they had the right to try to win with him?

I say they had a duty to replace him.

And what I'm trying to ask shouldn't be a partisan question. Does a party have a smidgeon of a fiduciary duty to provide candidates with enough crack so they don’t have to pimp out their wives and young daughters for dime bags of crack? (And, btw, I would not be surprised if his crack habit started at Columbia with Ayers.) I suspect we haven't thought about it before because the parties have never submitted someone so thoroughly hooked on crack.

Hey I’m not slandering Obama, the DNC did. I'm asking an earnest question: did your party have a fiduciary duty to remove him when they learned he was pimping out his wife and two young daughters for dime bags of crack?

Per CNN, on the Obama infighting:

One source involved in preparing him for interviews and the presidential debate told CNN "he had been pimping out his wife and two young daughters for dime bags of crack for 10 years."

Priceless.

4 comments:

Stephanie said...

If it were true that he [I can't even type the shit you proposed], then no he should not be president. There you go. Simple as that. And I should not have to point out that the thing you proposed is horridly sick and twisted, not to mention racist, and on a scale way beyond the Africa-is-a-continent story.

Michael said...

Does seem pretty incredible doesn't it? Hey, just asking a question...

Stephanie said...

An apples to apples comparison would have been if you'd postulated that he didn't know something. This isn't the same. It's putrid.

love johnson said...

Others who "bought" it: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Newsweek, Fox News (let me repeat that, Fox News).

What makes a good hoax is that the story has to have a tinge of believability. The Palin story did, not just because the story was coming from McCain and/or Palin aides, but because of her performances and statements. People thought about it and came to the conclusion that it was possibly true.

Your story totally defies believablity. Therefore the comparison is moronic at best; reeks of the type of hatred and racist overtones your party has fostered during the last few months at worst.

Disgusting...