I saw Letterman. This is a misrepresentation of what he said. He said first that he'd been talking about McCain's policies, that you can call them "change" (i.e put lipstick on them) but they're still the same as Bush. Then later he said, if I HAD been using this saying to reference Palin (which he'd just explained he wasn't), she would have been the lipstick and McCain's policies would have been the pig. So Drudge makes this a headline.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Drudge Watch
I saw Letterman. This is a misrepresentation of what he said. He said first that he'd been talking about McCain's policies, that you can call them "change" (i.e put lipstick on them) but they're still the same as Bush. Then later he said, if I HAD been using this saying to reference Palin (which he'd just explained he wasn't), she would have been the lipstick and McCain's policies would have been the pig. So Drudge makes this a headline.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/As_goes_Drudge.html?showall
yep, was just reading it: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/09/drudge-ology_101_softening_tow.html?nav=rss_blog
American Prospect discusses the topic: http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped
Post a Comment