Why did McCain's press release cite 100? I guess 300 is the new 100. But if you really want to count economists, try this: http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12342127. Also Greg Mankiw refused to sign that letter stating: But I thought the statement in the group letter that "his proposals run a high risk of throwing the economy into a deep recession" was a tad too hyperbolic for my tastes. http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2008/10/economists-against-obama.html#links
6 comments:
Oldtimers?
You mean they left the 10 oldest ones off the list?
Oldtimers=Alzheimers, yukyuk. Waht a dumb thing to do.
I count over 300 here:
http://www.economistsformccain.com/ObamaStatement.html#Signatories
Why did McCain's press release cite 100? I guess 300 is the new 100. But if you really want to count economists, try this: http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12342127. Also Greg Mankiw refused to sign that letter stating: But I thought the statement in the group letter that "his proposals run a high risk of throwing the economy into a deep recession" was a tad too hyperbolic for my tastes. http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2008/10/economists-against-obama.html#links
Krugman gives Obama 5 Nobel Prize winners. So all's even on that front.
Post a Comment